Deep State FBI and DOJ Caught Redacting Key Intel Documents that Implicate Hillary and DNC – Have Nothing to do with National Security!
Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) , Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, joined Maria Bartiromo on Fox News to discuss his investigation into the deep state spying on Donald Trump and his campaign. If you haven’t heard anything on this, it’s because there is a media blackout among liberal mainstream media channels.
This should be plastered all over every channel; Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration and top DOJ officials worked together to get FISA to approve a wiretap on Donald Trump and his administration.
Nunes told Bartiromo that a top Attorney for the democrats, Michael Sussman, was meeting with a top lawyer at the FBI before the FISA warrant was ever approved. The FBI lawyer, James Baker reported directly to James Comey.
This flies in the face of every testimony that was given under oath by DOJ and FBI officials who claimed they had no idea that the democrat party was behind the phony dossier.
Nunes continues, “So now you have absolute proof that that wasn’t told to the FISA court. So you want your evidence of FISA abuse? There it is right there… People should know it’s probably not appropriate for a top lawyer from the Democratic Party to take dirt and give it to the top lawyer of the FBI… Don’t forget. Originally the story from FBI and DOJ was that Republicans had started this information and given this information and that has been totally blown out of the water.”
Trump has already ordered the FISA documents and any text messages having to do with it to be declassified and released without all of the redactions so the truth can finally be revealed. Of course, democrats weren’t going to let that happen, that would expose the agenda they had the whole time.
Rod Rosenstein and other top officials who are closely involved in the Russia Dossier and FISA warrant met with President Trump to tell him that they couldn’t release the documents because “allies might get concerned.”
John Solomon from the Hill reported:
“There is now a concrete storyline backed by irrefutable evidence: The FBI allowed itself to take political opposition research created by one party to defeat another in an election, treated it like actionable intelligence, presented it to the court as substantiated, and then used it to justify spying on an adviser for the campaign of that party’s duly chosen nominee for president in the final days of a presidential election.
And when, nine months later, the FBI could not prove the allegation of collusion between Trump and Russia, unverified evidence was leaked to the media to try to sustain public support for a continued investigation.
That means the redaction of Footnote 43 had more to do with political embarrassment than with national security. And that should concern us all.”
Check out how heavily this document was redacted below:
— STEALTH JEFF (@drawandstrike) October 8, 2018