VIA| Legendary MLB pitcher Curt Schilling — who is not known for keeping his political opinions to himself — lit into Hillary Clinton after a sports reporter asked him to chime in on the 2016 presidential elections — and liberals are angry about what he said.
Schilling, an MLB analyst for ESPN, had an interview on Kansas City’s 610 sports radio Monday afternoon.
After Schilling gave some mild criticism of the Democrat presidential frontrunner, one of the liberal sports guys said Hillary had “by far” the “best resume” of any candidate in the race.
That’s when Schilling really let loose…
“I don’t care what her titles are,”he continued. “She’s done nothing. She’s done absolutely nothing to further the success of the middle class. She jumps on the backs of people who she wants to be dependent on government. She needs these people to be dependent on her.”
The host asked if Schilling thinks Hillary Clinton will go to prison. “I hope she does,” said Schilling. “If I’m gonna believe, and I don’t have any reason not to believe, that she gave classified information on hundreds if not thousands of emails on a public server after what happened to General Petraeus, she should be buried under a jail somewhere.”
Petraeus was forced to plead guilty to a Federal felony, pay a substantial fine, and be onprobation for two years. As a convicted felon, Petraeus also forfeited his right to vote, including in the 2016 Presidential election. Hillary is not only allowed to vote, but be a candidate for the highest office in America.
And all Petraeus did was show some classified articles to his mistress, Paula Broadwell, who showed it to no one. Clinton has been accused of distributing thousands of classified emails, to multiple parties, and experts have said her sever — managed by Sidney Blumenthal — was also likely hacked into by Chinese and Russian agencies.
Schilling — a Dr. Ben Carson supporter — also criticized Donald Trump for not providing enough specifics, but said he was gratified that Trump’s success showed that the electorate was giving a “big middle finger” to “both parties.”