There is an epic game of four-dimensional chess unfolding between those seeking to uncover the truth behind the Clinton Foundation – Uranium one relationship and those working feverishly to keep it hidden from the public.
The Daily Caller, in an exclusive article revealed that last Thursday:
FBI agents raided the home of a recognized Department of Justice whistleblower who privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.
The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.
The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by The DCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.
Most readers of this space know that there is not now, nor has there ever been, any legitimate evidence of Trump-Russia collusion that warranted the appointment of a special counsel, specifically the appointment of Robert Mueller.
As we concluded yesterday, as long as the goal has been to hide the FBI/DOJ criminal involvement in covering up the Clinton Foundation-Uranium One scheme, Mueller’s record of prosecutorial myopia, coupled with his role as the FBI Director who squashed the FBI’s Uranium One investigation so that the transfer would be approved, made him the perfect candidate for the job of special counsel.
As, one by one, members of the Insurance Policy” group have retired/resigned/been fired, Mueller has been left to shoulder, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the task of hiding evidence of the much larger corruption scheme that he and Rosenstein conspired together to keep the public from learning about in 2009-2010.
At the tip of this corruption iceberg is the Uranium One scandal that Mueller and Rosenstein prevented this whistleblower from making public, perhaps at the order of then President Barack Obama.
The exodus of corrupt DOJ and FBI officials has created a Manichaean struggle between light and dark within both agencies, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the special counsel all of whom are intent on keeping hidden their own involvement in various aspects of, not only the Uranium One scheme but, even farther reaching levels of corruption – Iranian nuclearization?
On Monday, Dan Bongino used his podcast to take a deep dive into who conducted the raid and why? (forward to the 3:15 mark)
Bongino discusses the two most prevalent theories as to why the raid was conducted and then suggested a hybrid theory that might make the most sense:
Theory One – This was a mop up operation wrapping up the investigation and securing the chain of custody of original evidence. If this was the case, why would a search warrant be necessary for a cooperating witness? It isn’t. Why would his lawyer be upset?
Theory Two – the raid is a bad sign. It was an effort by the FBI to scoop up evidence of FBI and DOJ corruption in relation to CF and Uranium One so they can be better prepared to defend against what’s coming.
Hybrid Theory – The raid was intended to learn what the whistleblower might’ve been holding back. Keep in mind, the whistleblower had already turned everything over to the corrupt SSCI meaning it is likely everyone who participated in the corrupt scheme already had access to the damning evidence so they could be able to prepare their defenses.
The potential for these events to poison the well of justice led Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley to send a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray requesting answers as to the purpose of the raid and the nature of the evidence that was seized.
Is justice finally coming?
We’ll see, but one line from the letter may be cause for concern:
Did the materials seized by the FBI during the raid contain any classified information? If so, was that information classified at the time Mr. Cain brought them to his residence?
Will this be the protective cover corrupt officials can use to hide behind? Will this allow the whistleblower to be vilified and silenced if he is found to have held anything back in an effort to protect himself?